Galloway JN, Cowling EB (2002) Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of change. China Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese) J Control Release 172:e18–e19Įditorial Board of China Agriculture Yearbook (2014) China agriculture yearbook. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin 14:725–730 (in Chinese with English abstract)ĭu CW, Shen YZ, Zhou JM (2013) Application of aqueous silicone-acrylate emulsions in coated controlled release fertilizer. Fertilizer research 26:179–187ĭu CW, Zhou JM, Wang HY (2005) Advance in polymer-coated controlled release fertilizers. Crop Sci 51:2237–2248ĭe Datta SK, Buresh RJ, Obcemea WN, Castillo EG (1990) Nitrogen-15 balances and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in upland rice. Nature 514:486–489Ĭonnell JA, Hancock DW, Durham RG, Cabrera ML, Harris GH (2011) Comparison of enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizers for reducing ammonia loss and improving Bermudagrass forage production. Carbohyd Polym 91:269–276Ĭhen XP, Cui ZL, Fan MS, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma WQ et al (2014) Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Molecules 18:7239–7252Ĭhen C, Tao SM, Qiu XY, Ren XQ, Hu SW (2013b) Long-alkane-chain modified N-phthaloyl chitosan membranes with controlled permeability. J Hydrol 260:206–215Ĭhen C, Gao ZD, Qiu XY, Hu SW (2013a) Enhancement of the controlled-release properties of chitosan membranes by crosslinking with Suberoyl chloride. Acta Pedol Sin 32(Supplement 2):128–135 (in Chinese)Ĭhen SK, Liu CWI (2002) Analysis of water movement in paddy rice fields (I) experimental studies. Agron J 103:92–99Ĭai GX, Zhu ZL (1995) Evaluation of gaseous nitrogen losses from fertilizers applied to flooded rice. Environ Sci Pollut R 20:8092–8131īlackshaw RE, Hao X, Brandt RN, Clayton GW, Harker KN, O'Donovan JT, Johnson EN, Vera CL (2011) Canola response to ESN and urea in a four-year no-till cropping system. China Agricultural Press, Beijingīehera SN, Sharma M, Aneja VP, Balasubramanian R (2013) Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Biol Fert Soils 36:207–214īao SD (2000) Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis, 3rd edn. Available at īanerjee B, Pathak H, Aggarwal PK (2002) Effects of dicyandiamide, farmyard manure and irrigation on crop yields and ammonia volatilization from an alluvial soil under a rice ( Oryza sativa L.)-wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system. Controlled release urea could be adopted as an effective mitigation alternative to retard N losses through NH 3 volatilization and surface runoff while improving ANR of double cropping of late rice.Īgrium Inc. Its single dose can meet the nutrient demand of the rice plant. Applying CRU could help increase N uptake in rice, reduce N losses through NH 3 volatilization and surface runoff, and hence improve ANR. It was found that CRU-2 resulted in the highest grain yield and panicle numbers among the N fertilization treatments in 20. Six treatments including (1) control with 0 kg N ha −1 (CK), (2) basal application of urea (U b), (3) split application (U s) of urea (50% at transplanting, 25% at tillering, and 25% at panicle stages), (4) CRU-1 (polyurethane-coated urea), (5) CRU-2 (degradable polymer-coated urea), and (6) CRU-3 (water-based polymer-coated urea) all applied at 165 kg N ha −1. A 2-year field experiment was conducted to compare the effects of three different types of polymer-coated urea fertilizer on nitrogen losses through NH 3 volatilization and surface runoff to the environment, ANR, grain yield, and N uptake as compared to conventional urea of rice. However, few studies have evaluated the comparative efficacy of different polymer-coated urea products on nitrogen (N) losses, ANR, and N uptake of rice. Controlled release fertilizer can reduce nitrogen losses to the environment while increasing grain yield and improving apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR) of rice.